Revista Científica ‘‘INGENIAR”: Ingeniería, Tecnología e Investigación. Vol. 8 Núm. (16) 2025. ISSN: 2737-6249  
Application of macrotexture and friction parameters in pavement management for road safety.  
APLICACIÓN DE PARÁMETROS DE MACROTEXTURA Y FRICCIÓN EN LA  
GESTIÓN DE PAVIMENTOS PARA LA SEGURIDAD VIAL  
APPLICATION OF MACROTEXTURE AND FRICTION PARAMETERS IN  
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT FOR ROAD SAFETY  
1
2
Moreno-Ponce Luis Alfonso ; Solórzano-Villegas Lucy Elizabeth ;  
3
4
Carvajal-Rivadeneira Daniel David ; Álvarez-Álvarez Martha Johana  
1
2
3
4
Resumen  
El estudio abordó mejoras en la seguridad vial mediante la integración de parámetros de  
macrotextura y fricción en un Sistema de Gestión de Pavimentos (PMS). El objetivo fue  
desarrollar y validar un marco que armonizara mediciones heterogéneas mediante el Índice  
Internacional de Fricción (IFI), estableciera umbrales operativos y produjera una priorización  
orientada al riesgo de intervenciones dirigidas a la pérdida de resistencia al deslizamiento. Se  
aplicaron procedimientos de adquisición estandarizados (perfilometría 2D/3D para MPD/ETD y  
mediciones de fricción continua/puntual), junto con controles de QA/QC, un flujo de trabajo ETL,  
conversión a IFI (ASTM E1960), estratificación por clase funcional y clima, y derivación de  
umbrales mediante análisis ROC/percentiles; la priorización se realizó con un esquema  
multicriterio (condición, exposición, coste y beneficio esperado). Los resultados mostraron series  
de IFI trazables por segmento, umbrales diferenciados por tipología de carretera y una lista  
jerarquizada de secciones críticas consistente con los registros de exposición y accidentes, lo  
que permitió una programación más efectiva de los tratamientos de conservación. Se concluyó  
que la integración propuesta permitió tomar decisiones reproducibles y auditables, enfocando los  
recursos donde el impacto esperado en la reducción del riesgo es mayor; se recomendó la  
calibración local de coeficientes y la incorporación progresiva de métricas 3D y series de tiempo  
para fortalecer la predicción y el monitoreo operativo.  
Palabras clave: Macrotextura; Fricción; IFI; Gestión del pavimento; Seguridad vial.  
Abstract  
The study addressed improvements in road safety by integrating macrotexture and friction  
parameters into a Pavement Management System (PMS). The objective was to develop and  
validate a framework that harmonised heterogeneous measurements via the International Friction  
Index (IFI), established operational thresholds, and produced a risk-oriented prioritisation of  
interventions targeting loss of skid resistance. Standardised acquisition procedures were applied  
(
2D/3D profilometry for MPD/ETD and continuous/spot friction measurements), together with  
QA/QC controls, an ETL workflow, conversion to IFI (ASTM E1960), stratification by functional  
class and climate, and threshold derivation using ROC/percentile analyses; prioritisation was  
performed with a multicriteria scheme (condition, exposure, cost, and expected benefit). The  
results showed traceable IFI series by segment, differentiated thresholds by road typology, and a  
ranked list of critical sections consistent with exposure and crash records, enabling more effective  
Información del manuscrito:  
Fecha de recepción: 08 de julio de 2025.  
Fecha de aceptación: 18 de septiembre de 2025.  
Fecha de publicación: 27 de octubre de 2025.  
438  
Moreno-Ponce et al. (2025)  
programming of preservative treatments. It was concluded that the proposed integration enabled  
reproducible and auditable decisions, focusing resources where the expected impact on risk  
reduction is greatest; local calibration of coefficients and the progressive incorporation of 3D  
metrics and time series were recommended to strengthen prediction and operational monitoring.  
Keywords: Macrotexture; Friction; IFI; Pavement management; Road safety.  
1. Introduction  
of vehicle control (Spitzhüttl et al.,  
020).  
2
Road  
safety  
is  
severely  
The problem is exacerbated on road  
compromised under wet-pavement  
conditions, where the loss of  
adhesion between the tyre and the  
road surface significantly increases  
crash risk. Various studies have  
shown that approximately 20% of  
traffic accidents occur during rainfall,  
with pavement skid resistance being  
sections  
with  
unfavourable  
surfaces, or  
geometry,  
worn  
insufficient drainage, where the  
incidence of skid-related crashes is  
even higher (Li et al., 2025;  
Pitaksringkarn  
et  
al.,  
2018).  
Evidence shows that decreasing  
friction values are directly correlated  
with increased wet-pavement crash  
rates, and that improving adhesion  
can reduce such incidents by up to  
a
determining factor in the  
occurrence of such incidents (fawzy  
et al., 2024; Fwa, 2017). The  
reduction in friction, caused by the  
presence of water and the diminution  
of surface macrotexture, limits  
vehicles’ ability to brake and  
manoeuvre safely, especially at  
higher speeds or in emergency  
situations (Cai et al., 2024; Najafi et  
68% (Lyon et al., 2018; Pardillo &  
Jurado, 2009). However, the  
management and assessment of  
skid resistance present challenges,  
since traditional methods do not  
always consider variables such as  
rainfall intensity, vehicle speed, or  
the irregular distribution of water over  
the surface (Cai et al., 2024; Fwa,  
al., the  
accumulation of water on the  
carriageway can generate  
2017).  
In  
addition,  
2
017). Therefore, it is essential to  
hydroplaning, in which contact  
between tyre and pavement is  
completely lost, resulting in total loss  
establish appropriate macrotexture  
and friction parameters within  
Pavement Management Systems  
Revista Científica ‘‘INGENIAR”: Ingeniería, Tecnología e Investigación. Vol. 8 Núm. (16) 2025. ISSN: 2737-6249  
Application of macrotexture and friction parameters in pavement management for road safety.  
(
PMS) in order to identify and treat  
The integration of these frameworks  
and parameters into Pavement  
Management Systems has evolved  
towards multicriteria models that  
consider not only structural and  
functional condition, but also safety,  
sustainability, and vehicle operating  
costs (Khahro et al., 2021). Recent  
experiences show that incorporating  
indicators such as IFI and PCI into  
PMS enables the prioritisation of  
interventions based on the risk of  
loss of adhesion and crash  
occurrence, optimising resource  
allocation and improving road safety  
high-risk sections as a priority and  
thus reduce crash frequency  
associated with loss of adhesion on  
wet pavements (McCarthy et al.,  
2
022; Pitaksringkarn et al., 2018).  
The development of regulatory and  
methodological  
pavement  
frameworks  
for  
management  
and  
evaluation has been led by  
international organisations such as  
PIARC, TRRL, and ASTM. PIARC  
(World Road Association) has  
promoted global guidelines for  
assessing safety and surface  
performance of pavements, while the  
United Kingdom’s TRRL (Transport  
and Road Research Laboratory) has  
been a pioneer in research on the  
relationship between macrotexture,  
friction, and crash occurrence,  
(Abu Dabous et al., 2020; Loprencipe  
et al., 2017). Moreover, the current  
trend is towards automation and  
digitalisation of data collection, as  
well as the application of multicriteria  
analysis  
methodologies for  
critical sections,  
prioritising  
establishing  
widely  
adopted  
integrating friction, texture, traffic,  
and sustainability variables in the  
comprehensive management of road  
networks (Abu Dabous et al., 2020).  
measurement methods and safety  
thresholds. For its part, ASTM has  
standardised procedures such as  
ASTM E274 for friction measurement  
and ASTM E965 for macrotexture, as  
well as the use of the Pavement  
Scientific evidence shows that  
reduced friction on wet pavements  
increases both the probability and  
severity of crashes, hence managing  
Condition  
Index  
(PCI)  
for  
of  
comprehensive  
assessment  
pavement condition (Loprencipe et  
al., 2017).  
macrotexture  
and  
friction  
as  
operational variables in PMS is  
critical for prioritising interventions  
440  
Moreno-Ponce et al. (2025)  
with a road-safety criterion. Reviews  
and empirical studies maintain that  
with schemes based solely on  
traditional structural or functional  
condition (Kumar et al., 2023).  
improving  
skid  
resistance  
is  
associated with substantial accident  
reductions, and that the friction–  
accident relationship persists after  
Objective. To develop and validate  
an  
integration  
framework  
for  
macrotexture and friction parameters  
within a PMS oriented towards road  
safety, which: (i) harmonises  
measurements via IFI to ensure  
inter-equipment comparability; (ii)  
establishes operational thresholds  
and risk maps by functional class and  
climatic setting; and (iii) implements  
a multicriteria prioritisation scheme,  
including condition, risk, cost, and  
expected benefit, for scheduling  
controlling  
operation,  
for  
for  
geometry  
example  
and  
with  
continuous devices such as SCRIM  
and seasonal correction  
methodologies (Fwa, 2017).  
In parallel, the PIARC, TRRL, and  
ASTM  
frameworks  
have  
consolidated protocols to measure  
and harmonise texture and friction,  
for example ASTM E274 for locked-  
wheel testing and the International  
Friction Index (IFI). This enables  
inter-equipment and inter-network  
comparability, which is indispensable  
for integrating thresholds and risk  
maps into asset management (ASTM  
International, 2020; PIARC, 2009).  
Methodologically, recent literature  
recommends combining texture  
metrics (MPD/ETD) and friction  
preservative  
and  
corrective  
treatments, with traceability to  
PIARC, TRRL, and ASTM standards  
and recent practices in safe  
pavement management.  
The article is structured into four  
parts: Conceptual and Regulatory  
Framework, which sets out the  
foundations of macrotexture and  
friction, IFI, and PIARC, TRRL, and  
ASTM guidelines; Materials and  
Methods, describing integration into  
PMS, including data acquisition and  
quality control, conversion to IFI,  
indicators and thresholds, risk  
(F60/BPN or continuous) with  
exposure to risk (traffic, climate,  
speed), and employing multicriteria  
prioritisation approaches within PMS,  
which have shown improvements in  
transparency and efficiency of  
preservative programming compared  
mapping,  
and  
multicriteria  
prioritisation; Results, presenting the  
441  
Revista Científica ‘‘INGENIAR”: Ingeniería, Tecnología e Investigación. Vol. 8 Núm. (16) 2025. ISSN: 2737-6249  
Application of macrotexture and friction parameters in pavement management for road safety.  
application at network and project  
levels, validation of the safety  
module, sensitivity analysis, and the  
intervention plan; and Conclusions,  
which synthesise contributions and  
recommendations for institutional  
implementation in Latin American  
contexts.  
parameters into a functional  
assessment module that enables  
the identification of sections with  
adhesion deficits and the  
prioritisation of their treatment.  
The methodological structure  
was  
designed  
to  
ensure  
coherence, traceability, and  
compatibility with institutional  
PMS  
inspection  
and  
2. Materials and Methods  
maintenance  
procedures,  
without modifying its operational  
architecture.  
2
.1. Methodological design and  
integration into the PMS  
2
.2. Data sources and data  
The study applied a quantitative and  
applied approach, aimed at  
acquisition  
integrating macrotexture and friction  
parameters within the Pavement  
Management System (PMS) for road  
Primary and secondary data were  
used and integrated into  
a
georeferenced database linked to the  
PMS.  
safety  
purposes.  
The methodology was organised into  
three main stages:  
Primary data:  
Macrotexture: determined by  
D/3D profilometry in  
Measurement: acquisition of  
texture and friction data at  
network and project levels using  
standardised equipment.  
2
accordance with ISO 13473-1,  
and by the volumetric sand patch  
method at  
verification points.  
Surface friction: obtained using  
water-filled wheel devices  
ASTM E1911 / EN 13036) and,  
(ASTM  
E965)  
Conversion  
and  
harmonisation: standardisation  
of results to the International  
Friction Index (IFI) to ensure  
(
comparability  
between  
at specific locations, with the  
British Pendulum Tester (ASTM  
E303).  
equipment and conditions.  
Integration into the PMS:  
incorporation of the converted  
442  
Moreno-Ponce et al. (2025)  
Secondary data:  
using the harmonisation equations  
established by PIARCTRRL:  
These included annual average daily  
traffic (AADT), percentage of heavy  
vehicles, operating speed (V85),  
climatic conditions (precipitation and  
temperature), road geometry, and  
records of crashes on wet  
pavements.  
퐹(60) = 푎 + 푏 × 퐹푖  
= 퐹(60) × 푒−푐(푆−ꢀꢁ)  
where 퐹(60)is the friction corrected  
to 60 km/h, is the measurement  
speed, and 푎, 푏, ꢃare the calibration  
coefficients for each device.  
Sampling  
was  
conducted  
by  
The the  
unification  
obtained with different devices and  
under different environmental  
conversion  
enabled  
homogeneous segments defined  
according to functional class and  
climatic setting. Each measurement  
was georeferenced using GNSS,  
with density proportional to the road’s  
level of criticality.  
of  
measurements  
conditions, ensuring inter-network  
comparability.  
IFI values were linked to the PMS  
inventory through a unique spatial  
identifier, forming the basis for the  
risk analysis and prioritisation  
Daily calibration routines, statistical  
variability control (coefficient of  
variation  
and  
z-scores),  
and  
technical acceptance criteria were  
applied in accordance with QA/QC  
protocols.  
described  
in  
the  
following  
subsections.  
2
.4. Construction of indicators  
Data were integrated into a relational  
database, normalised in units and  
test conditions, and prepared for  
conversion to IFI.  
and risk classification  
With the normalised values of  
macrotexture (MPD/ETD), friction  
(IFI), and functional condition (PCI),  
a road-risk matrix was prepared to  
identify sections with a higher  
probability of loss of adhesion on wet  
pavements.  
2.3. Normalisation  
and  
parameter conversion  
The  
values  
obtained  
for  
macrotexture (MTD or MPD) and  
friction (BPN, FN) were converted to  
the International Friction Index (IFI)  
The procedure comprised three  
phases:  
443  
Revista Científica ‘‘INGENIAR”: Ingeniería, Tecnología e Investigación. Vol. 8 Núm. (16) 2025. ISSN: 2737-6249  
Application of macrotexture and friction parameters in pavement management for road safety.  
Definition of thresholds:  
critical friction values were  
established based on PIARC–  
Surface friction (IFI)  
Pavement condition (PCI)  
Annual average daily traffic  
TRRL  
recommendations,  
classifying sections into three  
risk levels:  
(AADT)  
Unit intervention cost  
o High risk: IFI < 0.35  
Expected benefit in risk  
reduction  
o Medium risk: 0.35 ≤  
IFI < 0.45  
Each criterion was weighted through  
normalised linear weighting,  
o Low risk: IFI ≥ 0.45  
assigning greater weight to friction  
and traffic due to their direct  
influence on operational safety. The  
result was a Priority Index (PI) that  
enables the ranking of sections  
Integration of variables:  
texture, friction, and drainage  
indicators were related to  
traffic and climatic exposure  
using simple weightings,  
obtaining a composite risk  
index (SRI).  
according  
to  
the  
need  
for  
intervention.  
Operational  
validation  
of  
the  
This process provided a  
structured indicator base  
interoperable with the PMS  
conservation and planning  
modules, under verifiable  
road safety criteria.  
procedure was performed by  
verifying the coherence of the  
identified critical sections with  
historical records of crashes on wet  
pavements and with the annual PMS  
programme.  
This  
comparison  
ensured the technical consistency of  
the safety module and its applicability  
to decision-making for preventive  
and corrective maintenance.  
2
.5. Multicriteria prioritisation  
and operational validation  
Priority sections were selected using  
multicriteria analysis model  
compatible with the PMS  
a
environment. The factors considered  
were:  
444  
Moreno-Ponce et al. (2025)  
3. Results and discussion  
measures of central tendency and  
dispersion.  
3.1 General characterisation of  
Table 1 presents the descriptive  
statistics of the mean values of MTD  
surface parameters  
The initial characterisation made it  
possible to establish the variability of  
the recorded macrotexture and  
surface friction parameters in the  
evaluated road network.  
(
Mean Texture Depth), MPD (Mean  
Profile Depth), and BPN (British  
Pendulum Number), classified by  
functional road type. The results  
reflect a general trend of higher  
roughness on primary roads and  
lower friction values on urban  
sections, due to surface wear  
conditions and accumulated heavy  
traffic.  
The data obtained at network and  
project levels were processed  
statistically to determine their  
representative  
behaviour  
using  
Table 1. Descriptive statistics of macrotexture and friction by functional class.  
Functional class  
Primary  
MTD (mm)  
0,74  
MPD (mm)  
0,82  
BPN  
63  
Std. Dev.  
5,8  
CV (%)  
9,2  
Secondary  
Collector  
Urban  
Average  
0,59  
0,52  
0,45  
0,58  
0,66  
0,61  
0,54  
0,66  
67  
71  
76  
69  
6,5  
7,1  
8,2  
6,9  
9,7  
10,0  
10,8  
9,9  
Note. Mean values obtained from homogeneous network and project measurements.  
Figure 1 shows the comparative  
distribution of MTD and BPN values,  
evidencing moderate dispersion in  
macrotexture  
and  
a
slight  
concentration of friction values  
between 60 and 75 units, an  
acceptable range for in-service  
surfaces. This behaviour indicates  
functional  
uniformity  
between  
sections and an absence of  
significant outliers within the ranges  
expected by international standards.  
445  
Revista Científica ‘‘INGENIAR”: Ingeniería, Tecnología e Investigación. Vol. 8 Núm. (16) 2025. ISSN: 2737-6249  
Application of macrotexture and friction parameters in pavement management for road safety.  
Figure 1. Comparative distribution of mean MTD and BPN values.  
Note. Prepared with field data processed using descriptive statistics.  
The joint analysis of the parameters  
shows that the mean macrotexture  
equations established by National  
Academies of Sciences (2009) y  
PIARC (1995).  
(
0.58 mm) and the average friction  
BPN = 69) lie within the operational  
(
he purpose of this process was to  
range recommended by PIARC  
1995) for flexible pavements under  
ensure  
comparability  
between  
(
equipment and road networks,  
allowing the results to be expressed  
on a unified scale of friction corrected  
to a standard speed of 60 km/h.  
wet conditions.  
The differences observed between  
functional classes reflect only the  
expected behaviour by road type and  
traffic volume, without implying  
structural deficiencies or significant  
loss of adhesion  
The conversion was performed using  
the calibration coefficients a, b, and c  
for  
each  
device  
employed,  
determined according to reference  
tests and fitting curves established in  
international regulations. Table 2  
summarises the values adopted for  
each measuring device.  
3.2 Conversion and  
harmonisation of parameters  
Once the macrotexture (MTD/MPD)  
and friction (BPN) values had been  
obtained, they were converted to the  
International Friction Index (IFI), in  
accordance with the harmonisation  
446  
Moreno-Ponce et al. (2025)  
Table 2. Calibration coefficients used in conversion to IFI.  
Measuring device  
Base  
parameter  
BPN  
a
b
c
Reference speed  
(km/h)  
British Pendulum Tester  
0.045 1.125 0.045  
60  
(
BPT)  
Laser profilometer  
SCRIM or water-filled  
wheel  
MPD  
FN  
0.030 1.080 0.050  
0.000 1.000 0.040  
60  
60  
Note. Normalised parameters according to National Academies of Sciences (2009) and PIARC  
1995).  
(
unique spatial identifier, maintaining  
traceability by section, date, and  
The conversion was executed by  
applying  
the  
harmonisation  
equipment  
type.  
equations:  
Figure 2 shows the relationship  
between macrotexture (MTD) and  
퐹(60) = 푎 + 푏 × 퐹푖  
퐹푅 = 퐹(60) × 푒()  
퐹(60)represents  
friction  
(IFI)  
obtained  
after  
where  
friction  
conversion, which evidences an  
inversely proportional behaviour  
typical of asphalt surfaces: as  
macrotexture increases, friction  
tends to stabilise, maintaining an  
operational range suitable for road  
safety.  
corrected to 60 km/h, is the test  
speed, and 퐹푅is the harmonised IFI  
value.  
Subsequently, the data were  
integrated  
into  
the  
PMS  
georeferenced database using a  
Figure 2. Relationship between MTD and IFI after parameter conversion and harmonisation.  
Note. Representative linear fit of the inverse macrotexturefriction trend.  
447  
Revista Científica ‘‘INGENIAR”: Ingeniería, Tecnología e Investigación. Vol. 8 Núm. (16) 2025. ISSN: 2737-6249  
Application of macrotexture and friction parameters in pavement management for road safety.  
The linear correlation analysis  
between both parameters yielded a  
This stage made it possible to  
establish the spatial distribution of  
zones with greater susceptibility to  
coefficient  
of  
determination  
R^2=0.82, indicating a strong and  
consistent association between the  
variables, confirming the validity of  
the harmonisation and the quality of  
the normalised data.  
skidding  
on  
wet  
pavement,  
information essential for technical  
prioritisation within the PMS.  
Risk thresholds were defined in  
accordance with PIARC (1995) and  
the Guide for Pavement Friction  
(2009), adopting three operational  
ranges based on friction corrected to  
3.3 Classification and distribution  
of risk by sections  
Once the friction values had been  
converted to the International Friction  
Index (IFI) scale, the road network  
sections were classified according to  
their risk level associated with loss of  
adhesion.  
6
0 km/h (F60). Table 3 shows the  
classification applied and the  
percentage distribution of the  
sections evaluated in each category.  
Table 3. Classification of risk level according to normalised IFI values.  
Risk  
category  
High risk  
Medium risk  
Low risk  
Total  
IFI friction range  
Percentage of sections  
Cumulative length  
(%)  
22.8  
46.3  
30.9  
100.0  
(km)  
15.4  
31.2  
20.8  
67.4  
IFI < 0.35  
0.35 ≤ IFI < 0.45  
IFI ≥ 0.45  
Note. Thresholds defined according to PIARC (1995) and NCHRP (2009).  
The results indicate that almost half  
of the sections (46.3%) fall within the  
medium-risk range, which reflects  
acceptable surface conditions but  
with potential for degradation under  
heavy traffic or prolonged rainfall.  
vehicles, while the remaining 30.9%  
present safe conditions and  
adequate friction for operation on wet  
pavement.  
Figure 3 shows the percentage  
distribution of risk by functional class,  
evidencing a higher concentration of  
critical sections on secondary and  
urban corridors. The graphical  
representation makes it possible to  
The 22.8% classified as high risk  
corresponds mainly to urban and  
collector roads with reduced texture  
and a high percentage of heavy  
448  
Moreno-Ponce et al. (2025)  
visually identify the segments  
requiring preventive maintenance  
due to adhesion deficits.  
Figure 3. Percentage distribution of road risk according to IFI friction categories.  
Note. Prepared from the risk classification in Table 3.  
The analysis of Figure 3 shows a  
heterogeneous functional distribution  
of risk, consistent with the  
constructive diversity and surface  
ageing of the network.  
Priority Index (PI) were constructed,  
both aimed at decision-making within  
the PMS.  
The procedure was supported by a  
weighted multicriteria model, which  
assigns relative weights to each  
variable according to its influence on  
Taken together, the results provide  
an  
objective  
basis  
for  
the  
construction of the composite risk  
indicators presented in the following  
subsection, aimed at technical  
prioritisation within the PMS.  
road  
safety  
and  
pavement  
preservation.  
Table 4 presents the weighting  
matrix used, in which surface friction  
obtained the highest relative weight  
(0.30), followed by pavement  
functional condition (0.25) and  
annual average daily traffic (0.20).  
Cost and benefit factors were  
included with lower values due to  
their complementary nature.  
3.4  
Composite indicators and  
technical prioritisation  
From the results of friction (IFI),  
surface  
condition  
(PCI),  
and  
a
exposure to traffic (AADT),  
composite risk index (SRI) and a  
449  
Revista Científica ‘‘INGENIAR”: Ingeniería, Tecnología e Investigación. Vol. 8 Núm. (16) 2025. ISSN: 2737-6249  
Application of macrotexture and friction parameters in pavement management for road safety.  
Table 4. Weighting matrix applied for the calculation of the Priority Index (PI).  
Technical criterion  
Surface friction (IFI)  
Functional condition (PCI)  
Traffic (AADT)  
Brief description  
Tyrepavement adhesion level  
Surface condition and maintenance  
Annual average daily traffic  
Cost-to-treated-length ratio  
Impact on risk reduction  
Relative weight  
0.30  
0.25  
0.20  
0.15  
0.10  
1.00  
Unit intervention cost  
Expected benefit  
Total  
Note. Weights defined according to functional and operational incidence on road safety.  
The normalised values of each  
criterion were integrated by simple  
linear weighting, obtaining a Priority  
Index (PI) for each section of the  
network. This index enabled the  
ranking of segments with higher  
operational risk and optimised  
intervention scheduling in the PMS.  
Figure 4 comparatively represents  
the percentage contribution of each  
criterion to the PI. A dominance of  
friction and pavement condition is  
observed, which together contribute  
more than 50% of the model’s overall  
influence, validating its technical  
coherence  
objectives.  
with  
road-safety  
Figure 4. Percentage contribution of the criteria to the Priority Index (PI).  
Note. Prepared from the relative weights in Table 4.  
The analysis of the final index shows  
approach makes it possible to  
allocate preservative maintenance  
resources to sections with greater  
that prioritisation based on friction,  
condition, and exposure enables a  
more  
efficient  
operational  
adhesion maintaining  
deficits,  
classification than that supported  
solely by structural parameters. This  
traceability of the criteria and  
450  
Moreno-Ponce et al. (2025)  
reproducibility of the procedure  
within the PMS.  
(a)  
Data linking, where IFI, PCI,  
and  
AADT  
indicators  
were  
georeferenced using  
segment identifier.  
a
unique  
3
.5  
Integration into the PMS  
Safety Module  
(b)  
Normalization,  
which  
The integration of macrotexture and  
converted all variables to a 01 scale  
friction  
Pavement Management System  
PMS) was carried out through the  
parameters  
into  
the  
to ensure comparability.  
(
(c)  
And Operational validation,  
priority indices were  
Safety Module, designed to support  
data-driven decision-making for road  
safety interventions.  
where  
compared with official crash records  
to verify correlation consistency.  
This module consolidates the  
information obtained in previous  
The Table 5 presents the final  
prioritization of road segments  
according to the Priority Index (PI)  
generated by the multicriteria model.  
Segments classified as “Very High”  
and “High” priority correspond to  
those with reduced skid resistance  
stages  
(IFI  
conversion,  
risk  
classification, and prioritization) and  
links it with the functional and spatial  
structure of the road network.  
The  
integration  
process  
was  
and  
high  
traffic  
volumes,  
organized into three stages:  
representing the most critical points  
for immediate maintenance.  
Table 5. Final prioritization of road segments integrated into the PMS Safety Module.  
Segment  
ID  
Functional  
class  
IFI ( PCI ( AADT  
Priority Index  
(PI)  
Priority  
level  
)
)
S03  
S07  
S11  
S15  
Urban  
0.32  
0.38  
0.41  
0.46  
0.55  
0.60  
0.70  
0.78  
8900  
7200  
5600  
9100  
0.83  
0.74  
0.63  
0.52  
Very High  
High  
Medium  
Medium–  
Low  
Collector  
Secondary  
Primary  
S18  
Urban  
0.52  
0.81  
4300  
0.39  
Low  
Note. Classification based on weighted priority index (PI).  
The  
PMS  
Safety  
Module  
these  
the structure of the module,  
emphasizing the flow of data  
automatically  
updates  
classifications when new survey data  
are imported. The Figure 5 illustrates  
between  
the  
Survey  
Layer  
(macrotexture and friction), the  
451  
Revista Científica ‘‘INGENIAR”: Ingeniería, Tecnología e Investigación. Vol. 8 Núm. (16) 2025. ISSN: 2737-6249  
Application of macrotexture and friction parameters in pavement management for road safety.  
Analytical Layer (risk and priority  
models), and the Decision Layer  
(maintenance programming and  
safety evaluation).  
Figure 5. Structural scheme of the PMS Safety Module.  
Note. Integration of macrotexture, friction, and condition indicators for safety-oriented  
management.  
The PMS Safety Module enables  
traceable and reproducible  
prioritization, aligning maintenance  
programming with safety  
PMS makes it possible to identify and  
prioritise sections with higher risk  
due to loss of adhesion under wet  
conditions, in line with the literature  
that links available friction with crash  
probability, especially on wet  
performance rather than solely with  
surface condition. This integration  
directly fulfills the study’s main  
objective by embedding texture and  
friction-based parameters into the  
carriageways.  
framework  
The  
was  
proposed  
based on  
standardised measurements, IFI  
harmonisation, and the construction  
of thresholds and risk maps, which is  
consistent with reference guides and  
syntheses for friction management in  
road networks (National Academies  
of Sciences, 2009).  
PMS  
architecture,  
the  
thereby  
transforming  
management  
system into a safety-driven decision  
platform consistent with PIARC’s  
Safe System approach.  
Discussion  
Regarding the metrological basis,  
harmonisation via IFI resolves  
comparability between equipment  
and speeds, a problem documented  
The findings confirm that the  
systematic integration of  
macrotexture and friction into the  
452  
Moreno-Ponce et al. (2025)  
since the international experiment  
coordinated by PIARC and embodied  
in ASTM E1960. The combined use  
of a texture descriptor (MPD/ETD or  
MTD) and a friction metric corrected  
to 60 km/h (F60) improves inter-  
network traceability and the transfer  
of operational thresholds. This  
texture parameters and friction are  
integrated within statistical or  
multiscale frameworks. This supports  
the decision to combine IFI with  
texture and exposure indicators  
(traffic, climate, speed) to derive  
composite indices and reproducible  
prioritisation at network and project  
level. Advances in 3D scanning and  
its correlation with friction, especially  
with BPN and continuous measures,  
reinforce the adoption of hybrid  
approach  
aligns  
the  
practice  
presented with the PIARCASTM  
technical consensus and with the  
evidence that texture conditions the  
sensitivity of friction to speed  
schemes and  
for  
diagnosis  
(PIARC, 1995).  
monitoring (Kumar et al., 2023).  
The link between friction deficit and  
crashes has been reported in studies  
using continuous equipment, for  
example SCRIM and DWW, which  
In management and prioritisation,  
recent literature recommends  
multicriteria approaches, for example  
AHP or TOPSIS and fuzzy variants,  
which weight safety, condition, traffic,  
and costs, showing improvements in  
support  
investigation  
and  
intervention levels by site category  
and geometry. In particular, analyses  
of major corridors show that  
decreasing friction increases the risk  
of wet skidding and that targeted  
transparency  
and  
efficiency  
compared with strategies based  
solely on surface or structural  
condition. The proposal of a Priority  
Index that privileges friction and  
exposure is congruent with these  
friction-improvement  
programmes  
reduce crashes, results that are  
consistent with the use of thresholds  
and risk maps in the PMS (Parry &  
Viner, 2005).  
recommendations  
and  
with  
experiences of integrating friction  
and texture into PMS safety modules  
(
Marcelino et al., 2019; Xu et al.,  
From a modelling perspective, state-  
of-the-art reviews indicate that  
prediction of skid performance  
improves when three-dimensional  
2
024).  
In terms of safety impact, empirical  
evidence suggests that increases in  
453  
Revista Científica ‘‘INGENIAR”: Ingeniería, Tecnología e Investigación. Vol. 8 Núm. (16) 2025. ISSN: 2737-6249  
Application of macrotexture and friction parameters in pavement management for road safety.  
friction translate into crash reduction,  
with particularly clear effects in wet  
climates. Modelling and beforeafter  
approach presented is alignable with  
international standards, scalable,  
and auditable in PMS, offering a  
practical pathway to incorporate  
studies  
have  
reported  
crash  
modification functions (CMF) and  
investigation levels based on  
measurable friction, which supports  
the inclusion of thresholds and alert  
rules in the PMS. Thus, the proposed  
safety module is consistent with the  
practice of directing preservative  
maintenance towards sections with  
the greatest expected contribution to  
risk reduction (McCarthy et al., 2021,  
adhesion-related  
safety  
into  
conservation programming astm  
(ASTM International, 2015; National  
Academies of Sciences, 2009).  
4. Conclusiones  
1
.
The systematic integration of  
and friction  
macrotexture  
harmonised by IFI made it possible to  
construct operational thresholds and  
reproducible risk maps, enabling  
transparent identification of critical  
sections due to loss of adhesion on  
wet pavements within the PMS.  
2022).  
Finally, limitations and future lines  
are acknowledged. First, local  
calibration of IFI and thresholds by  
functional class and climate remains  
necessary for different aggregate  
gradations and operating speeds.  
2.  
The  
ETLIFISRI–  
prioritisation workflow demonstrated  
technical feasibility and traceability.  
The derived indicators, that is friction  
corrected to 60 km/h, MPD or ETD  
texture, exposure, and geometric  
context, were integrated into PMS  
operational dashboards with QA/QC  
criteria and data versioning.  
Second,  
seasonality,  
that  
is  
temperature and precipitation, and  
drainage variables can modulate risk  
and should be tagged for intra and  
inter seasonal comparisons. Third,  
the integration of time series and  
advanced 3D metrics can increase  
predictive power and decision  
stability. Fourth, the availability and  
quality of crash data condition the  
robustness of thresholds derived by  
ROC analysis. Nevertheless, the  
3
.
Multicriteria  
weighting friction, condition, traffic,  
cost, and expected benefit,  
prioritisation,  
generated a Priority Index consistent  
with safety evidence and with the  
454  
Moreno-Ponce et al. (2025)  
annual  
programme,  
favouring  
temperature and precipitation, and  
drainage conditions that are not  
always captured.  
preservative maintenance where the  
impact on risk reduction is greatest.  
4.  
IFI harmonisation resolved  
8.  
Future lines: incorporate time  
comparability between equipment  
and between corridors or seasons, a  
necessary condition for scaling  
adhesion management to network  
level and for interannual comparison  
in contexts with climatic variability.  
series and 3D texture metrics for  
more robust predictive models;  
explore non-linear and machine-  
learning  
models  
to  
capture  
interactions between texture, friction,  
and climate; strengthen seasonal  
correction and interoperability with  
geometry and HFST modules; and  
formalise local CMFs to quantify  
safety benefits.  
5.  
Operational validation through  
comparison with crash records and  
functional coherence between road  
classes showed concordance with  
the prioritised sections, reinforcing  
the usefulness of the safety module  
as decision support in maintenance.  
Bibliografía  
Abu Dabous, S., Zeiada, W., Zayed,  
T., & Al-Ruzouq, R. (2020).  
Sustainability-informed multi-  
6.  
In terms of public policy, the  
proposed approach facilitates the  
adoption of PIARC, TRRL, and  
ASTM standards in institutional  
management, improves resource  
allocation, and provides objective  
criteria for road safety audits based  
on adhesion performance.  
criteria  
decision  
support  
framework for ranking and  
prioritization of pavement  
sections. Journal of Cleaner  
Production, 244, 118755.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCL  
EPRO.2019.118755  
ASTM International. (2015). Practice  
for Calculating International  
Friction Index of a Pavement  
Surface.  
7.  
Limitations: (i) the need for  
local calibration of coefficients and  
thresholds by climate, aggregates,  
and speeds; (ii) dependence on data  
https://doi.org/10.1520/E1960  
-
07R15  
quality,  
including  
continuous  
ASTM International. (2020). Test  
Method for Skid Resistance of  
Paved Surfaces Using a Full-  
measurements and crash series; (iii)  
sensitivity to seasonality, that is  
Scale  
Tire.  
455  
Revista Científica ‘‘INGENIAR”: Ingeniería, Tecnología e Investigación. Vol. 8 Núm. (16) 2025. ISSN: 2737-6249  
Application of macrotexture and friction parameters in pavement management for road safety.  
https://doi.org/10.1520/E0274  
E0274M-15R20  
13(11), 5941.  
https://doi.org/10.3390/SU131  
5941  
_
1
Cai, J., Ong, G. P., Wu, D., Zhao, L.,  
Zhao, H. (2024). Assessing  
&
Kumar, A., Tang, T., Gupta, A., &  
Anupam, K. (2023). A state-of-  
braking performance on wet-  
road through water-depth  
the-art  
review  
of  
estimation  
pavement  
simulation.  
Journal  
and  
vehicle-  
dynamic  
measurement and modelling  
of skid resistance: The  
perspective of developing  
nation. Case Studies in  
Construction Materials, 18,  
e02126.  
International  
Pavement  
25(1).  
of  
Engineering,  
https://doi.org/10.1080/10298  
36.2024.2421896  
4
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CSC  
M.2023.E02126  
Fawzy, M. M., Shrakawy, A. Shawky  
El, Hassan, A. Atef, & Khalifa,  
Y. Ali. (2024). Enhancing  
sustainability for pavement  
maintenance decision-making  
through image processing-  
based distress detection.  
Li, Y., Deng, H., Zheng, Z., Shi, H., &  
Liu, R. (2025). Research on  
accident risk identification and  
drainage measures for wide-  
lane expressways during rainy  
days.  
Innovative  
Infrastructure  
Https://Doi.Org/10.1117/12.30  
Solutions,  
9(3).  
61647,  
13575,  
438443.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/S4106  
-024-01370-3  
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.30  
61647  
2
Fwa, T. F. (2017). Skid resistance  
determination for pavement  
Loprencipe, G., Pantuso, A., & Di  
Mascio,  
P.  
(2017).  
management  
weather  
and  
road  
wet-  
safety.  
Sustainable  
Management  
Pavement  
System  
in  
International  
Journal  
of  
Urban Areas Considering the  
Vehicle Operating Costs.  
Sustainability 2017, Vol. 9,  
Transportation Science and  
Technology, 6(3), 217227.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJTS  
T.2017.08.001  
Page 453.  
https://doi.org/10.3390/SU903  
453  
453,  
9(3),  
0
Khahro, S. H., Memon, Z. A.,  
Gungat, L., Yazid, M. R. M.,  
Rahim, A., Mubaraki, M., &  
Nur, N. I. (2021). Low-Cost  
Lyon, C., Persaud, B., & Merritt, D.  
(2018). Quantifying the safety  
effects of pavement friction  
improvements results from a  
Pavement  
System  
Management  
Developing  
for  
large-scale  
study.  
Countries.  
Sustainability  
International  
Journal  
of  
2021, Vol. 13, Page 5941,  
Pavement Engineering, 19(2),  
456  
Moreno-Ponce et al. (2025)  
1
45152.  
https://doi.org/10.1080/10298  
36.2016.1172709  
https://doi.org/10.1080/10298  
436.2015.1039005  
4
National Academies of Sciences, E.  
and M. (2009). Guide for  
Pavement Friction. Guide for  
Marcelino, P., Antunes, M. de L.,  
Fortunato, E., & Gomes, M. C.  
(
2019). Development of a  
multi criteria decision analysis  
model for pavement  
Pavement  
https://doi.org/10.17226/2303  
8
Friction.  
maintenance at the network  
level: Application of the  
Pardillo, J. M., & Jurado, R. (2009).  
An assessment of the skid  
resistance effect on traffic  
safety under wet-pavement  
conditions. Accident Analysis  
MACBETH  
Frontiers in Built Environment,  
(6), 437115.  
https://doi.org/10.3389/FBUIL  
2019.00006/BIBTEX  
approach.  
5
&
Prevention, 41(4), 881886.  
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AAP.  
2009.05.004  
McCarthy, R., Flintsch, G., & Izeppi,  
E. de L. (2021). Impact of Skid  
Resistance on Dry and Wet  
Weather Crashes. Journal of  
Transportation Engineering,  
Part B: Pavements, 147(3),  
Parry, A. R. ., & Viner, H. E. . (2005).  
Accidents and the skidding  
resistance  
standard  
for  
strategic roads in England.  
Transport  
Research  
04021029.  
Laboratory.  
https://doi.org/10.1061/JPEO  
DX.0000286  
PIARC.  
(1995).  
International  
Experiment to Compare and  
Harmonize Skid Resistance  
and Texture Measurements.  
McCarthy, R., Flintsch, G., Katicha,  
S., Izeppi, E. de L., & Guo, F.  
(
2022).  
investigatory levels of friction  
with crash modelling.  
International Journal of  
Pavement Engineering, 23(9),  
2363243.  
https://doi.org/10.1080/10298  
36.2021.1888089  
Determining  
Association  
internationale  
permanente des congres de la  
route.  
https://www.piarc.org/en/orde  
r-library/3826-en-International  
Experiment to Compare and  
Harmonize Skid Resistance  
and Texture Measurements  
3
4
Najafi, S., Flintsch, G. W., & Medina,  
A. (2017). Linking roadway  
crashes and tirepavement  
PIARC. (2009). Specification for a  
standard test tyre for friction  
coefficient.  
friction:  
a
case  
study.  
https://www.piarc.org/en/orde  
r-library/6274-en-  
Specification%20for%20a%2  
International  
Journal  
of  
Pavement Engineering, 18(2),  
21129.  
1
457  
Revista Científica ‘‘INGENIAR”: Ingeniería, Tecnología e Investigación. Vol. 8 Núm. (16) 2025. ISSN: 2737-6249  
Application of macrotexture and friction parameters in pavement management for road safety.  
0
0
standard%20test%20tyre%2  
for%20friction%20coefficient  
%
20measurement%20of%20  
a%20pavement%20surface:  
20ribbed%20test%20tyre  
%
Pitaksringkarn, J., Tanwanichkul, L.,  
Yamthale, K. (2018). A  
&
correlation between pavement  
skid resistance and wet-  
pavement related accidents in  
Thailand. MATEC Web of  
Conferences, 192, 02049.  
https://doi.org/10.1051/MATE  
CCONF/201819202049  
Spitzhüttl, F., Goizet, F., Unger, T., &  
Biesse, F. (2020). The real  
impact of full hydroplaning on  
driving  
Analysis & Prevention, 138,  
05458.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AAP.  
020.105458  
safety.  
Accident  
1
2
Xu, X., Wang, S., Kang, F., Li, S., Li,  
Q., & Wu, T. (2024). Multi-  
Attribute  
Decision-Making  
Method  
Maintenance  
Pavement  
in  
Preventive  
of Asphalt  
Based  
on  
Optimized Triangular Fuzzy  
Number. Sustainability 2024,  
Vol. 16, Page 2787, 16(7),  
2
787.  
https://doi.org/10.3390/SU160  
2787  
7
458